[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: proposing bash-3.0 upload to unstable

On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 06:51:54AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes:
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 10:34:38PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > I know, frozen for base packages, but fixing about 45 reports with
> > > this release. Packages at http://people.debian.org/~doko/bash/.
> > > The fixed bugs are marked in the BTS.

> > Do you believe the fixed bugs are important enough, and the likelihood
> > of breakage low enough, to justify an urgency: high upload?

> Fixing more than just one segfault, built and checked the test results
> of the release candidate 1 on every architecture, would propose an
> upload with urgency medium.

If you feel it only justifies an urgency=medium upload, then that's what
I would recommend.  This means it probably won't make the freeze, since
medium is 5 days and the 31st is 4 days from now, but those are the

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: