Re: Gnome 2.6 in unstable should be ok now ...
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 06:30:14PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > * gnutls 7->10 transition
> > The transition has been made in experimental for cups, gnome and related
> > packages.
> Hrm; is this going to screw up d-i?
debootstrap already installs libgnutls10 on sarge and sid, so it should
> > Is there anything else expected from the release team for Gnome2.6
> > before the upload to unstable or are we ok now ?
> I can't think of anything. Jeff? Colin? Steve? Joey? Any obvious reasons
> left why the Gnome 2.6 debs are definitely not ready for consumption yet?
Nothing from me ...
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]