Re: Package removal proposals
Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 03:22:20PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> remove dict-jargon/4.4.4-4
>> FTBFS (#229435). Eventually it will be fixed and it can go in again, of
>> course.
>
> Um. It's Architecture: all.
So what? It still has source and object files, since it generates stuff
from XML.
> Surely not all problems need to be resolved with an axe?
As I said, "Eventually it will be fixed and it can go in again, of course."
Do you want to release with packages which don't build from source?
That is the only question here. No prejudice against the package.
--
Make sure your vote will count.
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/
Reply to: