Re: Update: Scheduling another freeze of Jack-related packages
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 02:43:32AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> Can I suggest that, in the future, it would be a good idea to rename the
> jack-audio-connection-kit source package each time a new soname appears?
> That way, the old and new versions could coexist in testing and you
> wouldn't have this transition pain every time. You'd have to make
> another upload of the old source package to stop it building jackd, but
> that shouldn't be a significant problem compared to the current bad
> situation.
(Speaking strictly, I don't think you have to make an upload to stop jackd
being built; although any future uploads of the old package would certainly
need to not build jackd)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could.
http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
Reply to: