[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Gforge needs a nudge

On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 04:38:18PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:15:37AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 04:30:39PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
> > > Oh dear.  Funny (well, not really, actually) that it's not mentioned
> > > anywhere on the excuses pages.
> > 
> > > > php4 is a bit of a mess in testing at the moment, really.
> > 
> > >   I guess I'll have to go pester the php4 maintainer then.
> > 
> > Heck, one php4 maintainer is a buildd maintainer and the other is a
> > release assistant, and we /still/ don't have control over the situation.
> > ;P
> > 
> > The php4 packages themselves have no outstanding RC bugs in sid; it's
> > all just waiting on glibc now.

> Does that mean that britney shouldn't be trying to remove it from
> unstable any more? It appears that removing it isn't working, and I'm
> not sure it's worth trying to rip out everything that depends on it ...?

It looks like it's trying to remove it from testing rather than
unstable.  If it's not going, though, there's probably no sense in still
trying to remove it; I had hoped it could be done easily, so that we
could get rid of the completely broken packages in testing while
unstable sorts itself out.

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: pgpgAwyeta13A.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: