Re: Preparing 2.2r3

[Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>]

Chris Lawrence wrote:
> On Apr 01, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > latex2rtf   stable    1.1-6       arm, m68k, powerpc
> > latex2rtf   stable    1.8aa-2     alpha, i386, sparc
> > latex2rtf   updates   1.8aa-4     alpha, arm, i386, sparc
> > 
> > 	Changelog does not convince me to push it into stable:
> > 
> > 	* Upload to stable to overcome the "can't build from source" bug that
> > 	  breaks autobuild on some architectures.
> > 
> > 	* Add build dependency on debhelper.
> > 
> > 	m68k and powerpc missing
> > 
> > 	Maintainer: Chris Lawrence <lawrencc@debian.org>
> 
> Basically, the problem with -2 in stable is that there is a spurious
> .o file in the archive (and it comes from upstream).

It doesn't hurt for binary packages, I guess?

>                                                       -3 fixed this in
> unstable, and -4 fixes it in stable too.  I believe that's why -2
> was never updated on m68k and powerpc for stable.

Ok, that explains it.  Only because architectures are out of sync I'm
willing to let a new version in.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
The MS-DOS filesystem is nice for removable media.  -- H. Peter Anvin