summary attempt (was Re: problems with 2.2r1)
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 11:09:03PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Found problem with 2.2r1 as it is now:
> > * sparc dpkg uses a woody libc
>
> How would this have been detected?
With testing.
To get beyond the recriminations and such, the problems that need to
be solved for our process here:
- be sure to communicate here what from proposed-updates is going in
early
- be sure to reject stuff from proposed-updates early
(rejecting the kernel-image-2.2.17 for i386 right prior to 2.2r1
release was *not* good)
- be sure to announce the point release here at least 24 hours prior
to the release
- try to involve more testers
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: