On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 11:09:03PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Found problem with 2.2r1 as it is now:
> * sparc dpkg uses a woody libc
How would this have been detected?
> * 5 outsatnding security problems
I trust in future the security team will be getting security updates into
proposed-updates in a more timely fashion, then. If you're just refering to
random recompiles on other architecures, how do you propose we'll get any
better action in the future?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting.
We believe in: rough consensus and working code.''
-- Dave Clark
Attachment:
pgpLh8RIWWNMl.pgp
Description: PGP signature