Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication]
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > IIRC, the second release of 2.1 was called 2.1r2 to avoid the confusion I
> > am in the process of creating. We may mean the "r" to mean "revision",
> > but many people would interpret it as "release" and so would see 2.2 as
> > being identical with 2.2r1.
> >
>
> But still, if we are going to make that assumption, then we should call
> this one 2.2r1, and not skip the nomenclature. It's confusing.
Agree about it being confusing. If we want to keep "r" meaning
"revision", what about calling this one 2.2r0?
Phil.
-
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson St., Abbotsford, New Zealand; +64 3 4882818
Mobile 025 267 9420. I sell GNU/Linux CDs. See http://www.copyleft.co.nz
Reply to: