Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication]
>
> IIRC, the second release of 2.1 was called 2.1r2 to avoid the confusion I
> am in the process of creating. We may mean the "r" to mean "revision",
> but many people would interpret it as "release" and so would see 2.2 as
> being identical with 2.2r1.
>
But still, if we are going to make that assumption, then we should call
this one 2.2r1, and not skip the nomenclature. It's confusing.
--
-----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org -- bcollins@openldap.org -- bcollins@linux.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
Reply to: