Re: Preparing for first test cycle
Previously Richard Braakman wrote:
> No. Any such change means aborting the test cycle. This may be reasonable
> if a security problem is big enough, but I'm not going to decide that in
> advance.
I'm certainly very much against releasing with known security holes.
At this moment we already have to do 2.2.15+1patch :(
Wichert.
--
________________________________________________________________
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| wichert@liacs.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: