Re: Definitive package list for 2.1r5...

[Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE>]

Vincent Renardias wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> 
> > On Jan 21, Vincent Renardias <vincent@ldsol.com> wrote:
> > 
> >  >  [Vincent 2000/01/18]
> >  >  package      : mutt
> >  >  version      : 1.0.0-3.1
> >  >  architectures: i386 (ALPHA, SPARC & M68K MISSING!!!!)
> >  >  issue        : Y2K fix 
> > PLEASE REMOVE THIS PACKAGE! mutt 1.0.0 is not suitable for slink and the
> > fix is not critical enough to justify the time I would need to backport
> > the whole package.
> 
> Huh? what in mutt-1.0.0 makes it improper for use in slink?
> (this package has been recompiled with slink libraries, if it's what that
> makes you worry...)

Is mutt_dotlock back on board?  In former times it was missing, making
the package entirely unusable for reading mail.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
Whenever you meet yourself you're in a time loop or in front of a mirror.