Re: 2.1r3 -- no announce?
Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> writes:
> Nobody's got back to me about fixing the broken dependencies for the
> non-i386 architectures. I've done the source CDs though.
I never heard of this...
> A quick look at the things that have changed in the archive since I
> did the i386 images reveals that the packages don't seem to have been
> fixed for the other architectures.
Uh, no, I think nothing was moved in unless it was also compiled for
all other architectures....
> There's a problem with trn depending on new (potato) versions of
> ncurses, and something similar with sendmail depending on libc6.1 (>=
> 2.1) IIRC.
Huh? Why was that relevant for the 2.1r3 update? Were lib6.1
depedning packages put in stable?
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: