[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1036227: bookworm-pu: package r-cran-shiny/1.7.4+dfsg-3~deb12u1



Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: r-cran-shiny@packages.debian.org, 1035428@bugs.debian.org, debian-r@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:r-cran-shiny

I'd like to announce an upload to testing-proposed-updates

[ Reason ]
As discussed on the mailing list debian-release@l.d.o[1] the
accidental upload of r-base prevents r-cran-shiny from migrating
to testing since it has some failing tests due to the r-base
version conflict.  Thus an upload to testing-proposed-updates
seems an appropriate solution for this and this bug report is
about asking you for confirmation about this solution.

[ Impact ]
R-cran-shiny has an RC bug and is in danger to be not released
with bookworm.  It has quite some dependencies that would be
affected.

[ Tests ]
There is just a fixed symlink in the upload to fix the RC bug.
All tests are passing as usual.

[ Risks ]
The change to the package is minimal.

[ Checklist ]
  [x] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [ ] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
      --> will be attached once uploaded
  [x] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable

[ Changes ]

I propose to upload the following change to t-p-u:

$ git diff HEAD^
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 21d12c3..a2b6c26 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+r-cran-shiny (1.7.4+dfsg-3~deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium
+
+  * Upload to testing-proposed-updates "bookworm" due to the fact that
+    there was an accidental upload of a new version of r-base to unstable
+
+ -- Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>  Wed, 17 May 2023 07:56:25 +0200
+
 r-cran-shiny (1.7.4+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=medium


Nilesh Patra suggested to use version 1.7.4+dfsg-2+deb12u1 but I
personally regard my version suggestion more logical (long explanation
given in [2]).


[ Other info ]

Please confirm that I should upload to t-p-u (and raise your opinion
about the most sensible version in your eyes).

Kind regards and thanks for working as release team
   Andreas.


[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2023/05/msg00623.html


Reply to: