[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#1023731: Any idea why debci picks old versions (Was: Bug#1023731: BioC Transition blocked by new dependencies)



Hi Andreas,

On 28-11-2022 13:22, Andreas Tille wrote:
I'm constantly checking the tracker page of r-bioc-biocgenerics[1] to
follow the transition status.  I realised that debci picks old, not yet
fixed package versions like:

   r-bioc-biocfilecache/2.4.0+dfsg-1 while 2.4.0+dfsg-2 is in unstable
   r-bioc-biocsingular/1.12.0+ds-1   while 1.14.0+ds-2 is in unstable
   (I've just uploaded fixed r-bioc-bluster - lets see what will be picked)
   r-bioc-edaseq/2.30.0+dfsg-1 while 2.32.0+dfsg-2 is in unstable

It's not debci that picks them, but rather britney (our migration software) that doesn't know from the information it uses that r-bioc-biocgenerics from unstable makes r-bioc-biocfilecache from testing uninstallable. I haven't checked but I suspect that this transition is declared via Provides and this *might* mean that britney doesn't handle Provides ideally for this use case.

I wonder when debci will be run with the latest versions in unstable
that are fixing the build issues.

*Probably* when bugs in britney regarding this use of Provides are fixed. For now, I'll schedule some tests manually with the Release Team credentials.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: