Re: Bug#1023731: BioC Transition blocked by new dependencies

[Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>]

Am Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:54:13PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> If I understood that BioConductor packages should not block other
> transitions.  I've just pinged ftpmaster on IRC to check packages
> r-bioc-bsseq, r-bioc-dss, r-bioc-biocbaseutils and r-cran-ggrastr.
> The following packages are blocked by the packages in new:
> 
>    r-bioc-bitseq - should be removed from testing immediately bug just filed)
>    r-bioc-multiassayexperiment
>    r-bioc-demixt (bug #1024597 was just filed)
>    r-bioc-scater
>    r-bioc-mofa (just due dependencies)
> 
> Do you want me to file RC bugs against r-bioc-multiassayexperiment,
> r-bioc-scater and r-bioc-mofa.

Since r-bioc-scater is needed in autopkgtest of r-bioc-bluster[1] and
r-bioc-singler[2] probably also these two packages need a RC bug to not
block the transition.

The test suite issue of r-bioc-structuralvariantannotation is discussed
with upstream[4].  I'm fine to remove it from testing for the moment as
well.
 
Just let me know whether I should file the according bugs.

Kind regards
   Andreas.

[1] https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-bioc-bluster/28612583/log.gz
[2] https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-bioc-singler/28612594/log.gz
[3] https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-bioc-structuralvariantannotation/28615556/log.gz
[4] https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2022/11/msg00067.html

-- 
http://fam-tille.de