Re: Removal of S.h (was: Re: R 4.2.0 suggests a rebuild of graphics packages)
Hi Graham,
Am Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:16:27PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> > It seems to me, the situation being as it is, the easiest way to fix
> > bioconductor in unstable and testing is to upload the new versions scheduled
> > for April 27 before r-base migrates to testing. Not exactly clean, but bumping
> > the API now would require managing a transition and rebuilding hundreds of
> > packages that do not have an issue, right?
>
> Agreed, I don't think we want or need an r-api-* bump for this change.
> Besides, r-base will not be allowed to migrate due to autopkgtest
> failures anyway, so we will just have to wait for the r-bioc-*
> transition.
Fine for me.
> > > we can delay the creation of r-ge-api-*
> > > which might be discussed if this and only this is needed.
>
> Why delay the creation of r-ge-api-*? If it will help future
> transitions, I think now would be a good time to add it, seeing we
> already have to investigate which packages will need it.
Good point. I'd like to stress that I'm not against the r-ge-api-* ...
specifically if we decide that we do not want to bump r-api-* it seems
to be sensible to do it right now.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: