Re: Bug#1023731: BioC Packages are now clean (one exception with RC bug filed) (Was: Bug#1023731: Any idea why debci picks old versions)
Am Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 12:22:53PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> No, it's not. If you check the logs from r-bioc-htsfilter for example
> (https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-bioc-htsfilter/28944996/log.gz),
> you see that some packages have actual regressions:
The log has
Get:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing/main r-bioc-htsfilter 1.36.0+dfsg-1 (dsc) [2,244 B]
which is BioC 3.15. In unstable is r-bioc-htsfilter 1.38.0+dfsg-2 which belongs to
Bioc 3.15
> Removing autopkgtest-satdep (0) ...
> autopkgtest [19:15:37]: test run-unit-test: [-----------------------
> cp: cannot stat '/usr/share/doc/r-bioc-htsfilter/tests/*': No such file or directory
This line is in the test of the *old* package and was fixed in
1.38.0+dfsg-2. I can't do anything about this, sorry.
> > If this might help and is easily to realise removing all r-bioc-*
> > packages from testing could enable the migration of the packages in
> > unstable.
>
> I've done that now.
Thanks. This will hopefully solve that situation.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: