In data giovedì 18 giugno 2020 12:51:59 CEST, Nicholas D Steeves ha scritto: > It just occurred to me that I thought we were waiting for upstream to > make a new release (now that would be ≥20.04.3), because from the > little I've learned about ABI updates "libkaccounts1" will also need > to be updated. Is that supposition correct? I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. For sure we will need to bump the SONAME of the libkaccounts library, because it is a public library and it had an ABI break. Ideally it should be done upstream, so we don't do it twice... assuming they answer. If upstream does not answer or does not care, we must apply our system, i.e. the ABI manager. -- Pino Toscano
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.