[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Comments regarding breeze-grub_5.10.3-1_amd64.changes



Hey,

> I marked the package for accept, but as the license of debian/* should
> be GPL-3+, the license text should not only point to GPL-3.

I read a lot of on the SPDX webpage, because the copyright file should use the 
names from SDPX and found out, that GPL-3+[1] is not a valid license name 
anymore, because they see the "+" symbol as expression, like documented in 
their FAQ [2]. At least for me that makes a lot of sense to not see GPL-3+ as 
own license... 

Best Regards,

sandro


[1] https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-3.0+.html
[2] https://spdx.org/frequently-asked-questions-faq-0
Why do I only see GPL-2.0 only listed on the SPDX License List? How do I 
represent a GPL-2.0 or later license option?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: