On sábado, 25 de febrero de 2017 10:56:59 ART Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Saturday, February 25, 2017 12:29:31 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez > Meyer > wrote: > > On sábado, 25 de febrero de 2017 14:03:31 ART John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > > wrote: > > > Hi Sebastian! > > > > > > I just gave it a try and khtml builds fine as is. > > > > > > Are there any additional tests you'd suggest for testing whether khtml > > > works fine with libssl1.1? Attached is the build log of a successful > > > test build of the current khtml package. > > > > I think the issue here is if it will work or not at runtime. > > > > Sebastian: have you seen it crash due to this? > > Kf5 (including khtml) need to use the same version of openssl as Qt5, which > is 1.0 for this cycle. Whether crashes have been seen or not, trying to > mix openssl 1.0 and 1.1 in the same stack seems foolhardy. I agree with that. -- Un viejo proverbio de El.Machi dice que la memoria es como las papas fritas... ¡nunca sobran! Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.