On Saturday, February 25, 2017 12:29:31 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On sábado, 25 de febrero de 2017 14:03:31 ART John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > Hi Sebastian! > > > > I just gave it a try and khtml builds fine as is. > > > > Are there any additional tests you'd suggest for testing whether khtml > > works fine with libssl1.1? Attached is the build log of a successful > > test build of the current khtml package. > > I think the issue here is if it will work or not at runtime. > > Sebastian: have you seen it crash due to this? Kf5 (including khtml) need to use the same version of openssl as Qt5, which is 1.0 for this cycle. Whether crashes have been seen or not, trying to mix openssl 1.0 and 1.1 in the same stack seems foolhardy. Scott K
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.