Bug#799142: marked as done (sddm: fails to build architecture independent packages)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:19:43 +0000
with message-id <E1ZcCch-0001Lk-K9@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#799142: fixed in sddm 0.12.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #799142,
regarding sddm: fails to build architecture independent packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
799142: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=799142
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sddm
Version: 0.12.0-3
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer,
Recently you have done source-only upload of sddm/0.12.0-3 package.
Unfortunately this package is not yet ready for building of architecture
independent packages separately[1], therefor sddm-theme-maui,
sddm-theme-circles, sddm-theme-elarun and sddm-theme-maldives packages
are currently unavailable in Debian unstable.
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sddm&arch=all&ver=0.12.0-3&stamp=1442259701
Please fix this FTBFS or upload package in usual way.
You may test architecture independent builds using something like this:
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -A
Best regards,
Boris
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sddm
Source-Version: 0.12.0-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sddm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 799142@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Maximiliano Curia <maxy@debian.org> (supplier of updated sddm package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:06:00 +0200
Source: sddm
Binary: sddm sddm-theme-maui sddm-theme-circles sddm-theme-elarun sddm-theme-maldives sddm-dbg
Architecture: source
Version: 0.12.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian/Kubuntu Qt/KDE Maintainers <debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Maximiliano Curia <maxy@debian.org>
Description:
sddm - modern display manager for X11
sddm-dbg - modern display manager for X11 -- debugging symbols
sddm-theme-circles - 'Circles' theme for SDDM X11 display manager
sddm-theme-elarun - 'Elarun' Theme for SDDM X11 display manager
sddm-theme-maldives - 'Maldives' theme for SDDM X11 display manager
sddm-theme-maui - 'Maui' theme for SDDM X11 display manager
Closes: 799142
Changes:
sddm (0.12.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Fix indep build. (Closes: #799142) Thanks to Boris Pek
Checksums-Sha1:
4ed0d201b8b56d047fd8d79e78e2e73b40083f71 2464 sddm_0.12.0-4.dsc
fd1de39d3f50ad9bcf0fd341910bf4eaaf03cf65 40632 sddm_0.12.0-4.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
157a79571cabcce5e3862a1178fd13bc9758a86a7f647d4d14826afc9cc8438c 2464 sddm_0.12.0-4.dsc
26b1cb64d6703e324393b5c7e0a4d56e80007a2041f42315f530c814ab5f13ff 40632 sddm_0.12.0-4.debian.tar.xz
Files:
104f8dd51d65a3083d8b221f3f98a52e 2464 kde optional sddm_0.12.0-4.dsc
19a8ba13a0245bb81650c08d30678043 40632 kde optional sddm_0.12.0-4.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=11Jx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: