Re: Comments regarding breeze_5.3.2-1_amd64.changes

To: Maximiliano Curia <maxy@debian.org>
Cc: Thorsten Alteholz <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>, Debian/Kubuntu Qt/KDE Maintainers <debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Comments regarding breeze_5.3.2-1_amd64.changes
From: Thorsten Alteholz <alteholz@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 16:01:53 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.02.1507021551220.21670@jupiter.server.alteholz.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20150701214620.GF10935@gnuservers.com.ar>
References: <[🔎] 20150701214620.GF10935@gnuservers.com.ar>

Hi Maxy,

On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Maximiliano Curia wrote:

Would an alternative be still conflicting with policy point 2.2.1?

as long as there is one alternative so that all Depends: and Recommends:can be installed, everything is fine.


  Thorsten

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Comments regarding breeze_5.3.2-1_amd64.changes
  - From: Maximiliano Curia <maxy@debian.org>