Hi Adam, On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 04:41:13 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: >> Did you check if there should be a similar change in qv4targetplatform_p.h? > > All of that file is #if ENABLE(ASSEMBLER), which my patch disables on x32 > (using non-JIT code paths). Once real porting is done, the CPU(X86_64) part > looks like it could be used without changing, but for now that's a moot > question. OK. >> Can you please test that qtdeclarative with your patch builds/works? > > It built ok. Not sure what's the best way to test whether it executes > (end-user reverse-deps like, say, 2048-qt, require far more qt5.4 parts). Try qtdeclarative5-examples. I uploaded qtdeclarative 5.4.1-1 today without your patch (sorry), but I will include it in the next upload (provided that it works for you). -- Dmitry Shachnev
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature