[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#410173: marked as done (kontact: sync fails with undefined symbol)



Your message dated Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:38:36 -0400
with message-id <p2g9f694b821004161638r6a98428dx4ae1a68360d9a9fe@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: About bug # 410173 in Debian BTS
has caused the Debian Bug report #410173,
regarding kontact: sync fails with undefined symbol
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
410173: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=410173
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: kontact
Version: 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-6
Severity: normal

Hi, when I try to sync my Kontact Contacts with my WinCE iPaq, using
kontact's synchronisation option, the synce-device konnector and the
addressbook connector plugins, the kontact window just disappears
without any error message. (No error message is bad, but not syncing is
worse)

If ran from konsole, I see what it prints:

kontact: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libsyncedevicekonnector.so: undefined symbol: _ZN3Rra7connectEv

Probably missing dependencies, or incompatible versions of packages? I
don't know. But I would like to be able to sync, and this part just
doesn't work.

Cheers,
Gabor

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (499, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages kontact depends on:
ii  kdelibs4c2a            4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-5 core libraries and binaries for al
ii  libc6                  2.3.6.ds1-10      GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1                1:4.1.1-21        GCC support library
ii  libkcal2b              4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-6  KDE calendaring library
ii  libkdepim1a            4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-6  KDE PIM library
ii  libkpimidentities1     4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-6  KDE PIM user identity information 
ii  libqt3-mt              3:3.3.7-3         Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libstdc++6             4.1.1-21          The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

Versions of packages kontact recommends:
ii  kaddressbook            4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-6 KDE NG addressbook application
ii  kitchensync             4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-6 Synchronization framework
ii  kmail                   4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-6 KDE Email client
ii  knode                   4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-6 KDE news reader
ii  knotes                  4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-6 KDE sticky notes
ii  korganizer              4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-6 KDE personal organizer

-- no debconf information

Versions of packages I think may be interesting, but it seems there is
no dependency link for them:
ii  multisync                0.82-8          A program to synchronize PIM data
ii  synce-kde                0.9.1-1         PC / Windows CE connection service application
ii  synce-multisync-plugin   0.9.0-4         a plugin for multisync to sync with your WindowsCE devices
ii  synce-serial             0.9.1-3         SynCE connection manipulation scripts
ii  syncekonnector           0.3.2-3         a connector-plugin for raki (SynCE-KDE)
ii  libsynce0                0.9.3-1         A helper library for synce, a tool to sync WinCE devices


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
no answer from submitter since more than a month
closing this bug report
Olivier


2010/3/11, Olivier Vitrat <ovit.debian@gmail.com>:
> Hello
>  You've reported the following bug in Debian BTS:
>  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=410173
>
>  Are you able to reproduce it with a recent version of the package ?
>  If not, can we close this old bug report ?
>
>  Thanks
>
> Olivier
>


--- End Message ---

Reply to: