[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#406589: marked as done (genkdmconf introduces non-default settings into /var/run/kdm/kdmrc)



Your message dated Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:37:19 -0400
with message-id <u2o9f694b821004161637qf706e4e0h3f30be3018b8915e@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#406589: About bug # 406589 in Debian BTS
has caused the Debian Bug report #406589,
regarding genkdmconf introduces non-default settings into /var/run/kdm/kdmrc
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
406589: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=406589
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: kdm
Version: 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-5
Severity: normal

When /etc/kde3/kdm/kdmrc has ReserveServers commented out, genkdmconf inserts
a value (something like :1,:2,:3, but I don't have it with me) other than the
documented default, which is "".  The result for me was that upon upgrade to
the latest version in etch, my kdm failed to start.  Besides being inconvenient
to track down, this change made on December 11, 2006 to add customization support
results in the kdmrc file not behaving as its comments document.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages kdm depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.11            Debian configuration management sy
ii  kdebase-bin            4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-5 core binaries for the KDE base mod
ii  kdebase-data           4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-5 shared data files for the KDE base
ii  kdelibs4c2a            4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-5 core libraries and binaries for al
ii  libc6                  2.3.6.ds1-8       GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1                1:4.1.1-19        GCC support library
ii  libpam-runtime         0.79-4            Runtime support for the PAM librar
ii  libpam0g               0.79-4            Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libqt3-mt              3:3.3.7-2         Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libstdc++6             4.1.1-19          The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6               2:1.0.3-4         X11 client-side library
ii  libxau6                1:1.0.1-2         X11 authorisation library
ii  libxdmcp6              1:1.0.1-2         X11 Display Manager Control Protoc
ii  libxtst6               1:1.0.1-5         X11 Testing -- Resource extension 
ii  xbase-clients          1:7.1.ds-3        miscellaneous X clients

Versions of packages kdm recommends:
ii  logrotate                     3.7.1-3    Log rotation utility

-- debconf information:
  kdm/stop_running_server_with_children: false
* kdm/default_servers_nolisten_tcp:
* kdm/default_servers_100dpi:
* shared/default-x-display-manager: kdm
* kdm/default_nolisten_udp:
  kdm/daemon_name: /usr/bin/kdm
  kdm/oldconfig:


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I'm closing this bug report. If you can reproduce it after an upgrade,
feel free to reopen it
Olivier

2010/3/12, David Roundy <droundy@abridgegame.org>:
> Well, I don't use kdm any more, and haven't upgraded it recently, so I
>  have little idea whether it's a problem or not.  So I don't have any
>  strong feelings as to whether you should close the bug report.
>
>  David
>
>  On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Olivier Vitrat <ovit.debian@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > Hello
>  > You've reported the following bug in Debian BTS:
>  > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=406589
>  >
>  > Are you able to reproduce it with a recent version of the package ?
>  > If not, can we close this old bug report ?
>  >
>  > Thanks
>  > Olivier
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
>  --
>
> David Roundy
>


--- End Message ---

Reply to: