Re: proposal to remove skim and scim-qtimm from sid
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 01/13/10 23:51, Zhengpeng Hou wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Jaldhar H. Vyas <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Question: is ibus a complete replacement for scim at this stage? If so we
>> may want to deprecate scim altogether.
> yes, and I agree on this
ibus is good, but still has some issues.
I think we should focus on skim and scim-qtimm only.
"deprecate scim" is another topic and should be discussed with much more
people that are not CCed now.
I think it is better to orphan skim and scim-qtimm first,
before removing them completely.
skim depends on KDE3.
Since KDE3 will not be supported by upstream and Debian KDE team,
remove skim is much more reasonable.
scim-qtimm does not depend on KDE3.
There are still some Qt3 based applications that can use scim-qtimm.
Wen-Yen Chuang (caleb), scim-array maintainer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----