[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#516612: marked as done (kaddressbook: Post-Lenny gnokii SONAME bump)

Your message dated Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:47:18 +0100
with message-id <49A45CD6.8010804@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#516612: kaddressbook: Post-Lenny gnokii SONAME bump
has caused the Debian Bug report #516612,
regarding kaddressbook: Post-Lenny gnokii SONAME bump
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
516612: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516612
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: kaddressbook
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote on 13/10/08 18:41:
> Just to let the maintainers of packages which depend on gnokii know
> soon enough:
> A new version has just been uploaded to experimental and is
> currently in NEW. It includes a soname bump to libgnokii4 and will
> - of course - only enter unstable after Lenny, but I figure it
> doesn't hurt to let people know in advance.

Following up on this: I plan on uploading the new version to unstable
as soon as possible.
Since there are just 3 packages that depend on libgnokii3(-dev) I
assume it'd be ok to just deal with the transition personally on a
per-package basis.
I'd only go ahead with the upload when all of the emailed package-
maintainers OK it and have versions prepared with the changed
(build-)deps.

I'll report a bug against gnokii as being blocked by the 3 wishlist
bugs about the transition, as soon as these bugs get numbered.

Please let me know if you consider this should be handled some other
way.

Cheers


-- 
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

Dato brought to my attention[0] that kaddressbook doesn't even depend on
libgnokii in unstable, only in experimental, so this bug doesn't apply.

Sorry for blindly trusting 'whodepends' and please disregard the noise!

Cheers

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2009/02/msg00633.html

-- 
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]

--- End Message ---
Reply to: