[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#446105: marked as done (The kdewebdev broken on etch-backports for i386)



Your message dated Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:35:51 +0200
with message-id <200710101735.58681.debian@pusling.com>
and subject line Bug#446105: The kdewebdev broken on etch-backports for i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: kdewebdev
Version: 4:3.5.5-1
Severity: normal


I am trying to install the kdewebdev that is available as upgrades from
etch-backports. 

Everything is OK for the architecture amd64 but for i386 the package is
broken because:

1 - kdewebdev_3.5.7-2~bpo40+1_all.deb  depends on quanta version 3.5.7. 
2 - quanta_3.5.7-2~bpo40+1_amd64.deb  is available but the
correswponding i386 backport is not. 
3 - If etch-backports is in sources.list, apt-get just prevents
installing kdewebdev alltogether.

    Please provide the backport also for architecture i386.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_PT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_PT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages kdewebdev depends on:
ii  kfilereplace                  4:3.5.5-1  batch search-and-replace component
ii  kimagemapeditor               4:3.5.5-1  HTML image map editor for KDE
ii  klinkstatus                   4:3.5.5-1  web link validity checker for KDE
ii  kommander                     4:3.5.5-1  visual dialog builder and executor
ii  kxsldbg                       4:3.5.5-1  graphical XSLT debugger for KDE
ii  quanta                        4:3.5.5-1  web development environment for KD

kdewebdev recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Backports doesn't belong in bts.

/Sune

On Wednesday 10 October 2007, Antonio Amorim wrote:
> Package: kdewebdev
> Version: 4:3.5.5-1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> I am trying to install the kdewebdev that is available as upgrades from
> etch-backports.
>
> Everything is OK for the architecture amd64 but for i386 the package is
> broken because:
>
> 1 - kdewebdev_3.5.7-2~bpo40+1_all.deb  depends on quanta version 3.5.7.
> 2 - quanta_3.5.7-2~bpo40+1_amd64.deb  is available but the
> correswponding i386 backport is not.
> 3 - If etch-backports is in sources.list, apt-get just prevents
> installing kdewebdev alltogether.
>
>     Please provide the backport also for architecture i386.
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 4.0
>   APT prefers stable
>   APT policy: (500, 'stable')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=pt_PT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_PT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
>
> Versions of packages kdewebdev depends on:
> ii  kfilereplace                  4:3.5.5-1  batch search-and-replace
> component ii  kimagemapeditor               4:3.5.5-1  HTML image map
> editor for KDE ii  klinkstatus                   4:3.5.5-1  web link
> validity checker for KDE ii  kommander                     4:3.5.5-1 
> visual dialog builder and executor ii  kxsldbg                      
> 4:3.5.5-1  graphical XSLT debugger for KDE ii  quanta                      
>  4:3.5.5-1  web development environment for KD
>
> kdewebdev recommends no packages.
>
> -- no debconf information



-- 
How to save the system from X-Windows?

You neither can ever reinstall on a firewall of the folder, nor must cancel 
the tower.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: