On Monday 31 December 2007, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Hi, > > I don't have any reason to doubt what you say about qt's SIGBUS on > hppa. But where is this documented? Without an documented > evidence trail, we can't collaborate on solving this; instead, > each person using "qmake" will run into this independently and > waste time re-doing the legwork that you have already done. > > Rather than relying on supposition and rumour, maybe we could > leave this bug open until the actual facts are in evidence. > The bug was closed on the strength of > > According to some hppa people it is a misconfiguration somewhere > on the buildds, so we are currently doing nothing except poking > hppa buildd people occasionally. This is from right after midnight CET in #debian-devel on the day change to the 31st 00:05 < pusling> lamont: what is "bus error" on hppa ? 00:06 < lamont> pusling: unaligned load/store 00:06 < lamont> pusling: more specically, valid address, permission fault 00:06 < pusling> lamont: is unaligned load/store enough to make builds fail ? 00:06 < lamont> pusling: was - I turned that off rather recently If people want to create patches for the unaligned load/store they are most welcome to do so. I don't plan to. > For starters, maybe Sune could post some more details about the > alleged misconfiguration. For example, the URL to a relevant mailing > list discussion would be nice. Most of this has been in #-devel on irc. > Also nice would be some evidence of "poking hppa buildd people". For > example, was it brought up on debian-hppa? If so the message URLs > would be useful. debian-$arch@ isn't contact address for buildd people. /Sune -- Man, do you know how to save a 3D attachment from Netscape XP? You neither should ever unlink the 3Dfx mail, nor must boot the LCD digital port for telnetting on a controller to a directory on a controller of the Internet site.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.