Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in "reply to".
Am Freitag 10 November 2006 21:02 schrieb Kevin Krammer:
> The reply-to is not set.
> I did a bit of experimentation and it seems that 'r' replies to the
> list if reply-to is absent, but uses reply-to if present
which would be even more confusing...
> Would be interesting to have an earlier version of KMail to check. Do
> you remember which version still worked the way you expected?
Well I would have said the last 3.5.4 but that's not true as I just
checked. My wife uses still 3.5.2(1.9.1) which already behaves like
3.5.5(1.9.5).
Perhaps someone could check with the sarge version just to be sure.
so long
Chris
Reply to: