[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in "reply to".



On Friday 10 November 2006 20:16, Christian Frommeyer wrote:
> Am Freitag 10 November 2006 19:54 schrieb Kevin Krammer:

> > Which mailinglist did you test it with, maybe it sets itself as the
> > reply-to address?
>
> I first realised the problem on a private list but its the same with
> e.g. debian-user-german. Sample headers below:

[snipped headers]

The reply-to is not set.
I did a bit of experimentation and it seems that 'r' replies to the list if 
reply-to is absent, but uses reply-to if present

Would be interesting to have an earlier version of KMail to check. Do you 
remember which version still worked the way you expected?

Cheers,
Kevin

Attachment: pgpLeegHKqunX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: