[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#365710: kdm: Possible duplicate of x11-common bug fixed in unstable



Package: kdm
Version: 4:3.5.2-2+b1
Followup-For: Bug #365710


You can check if the file 

	/etc/X11/Xsession

exists. If not, this is probably a duplicate of #366007 (and some other
merged bug reports) that bit me yesterday. It should be fixed by
upgrading x11-common. 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.14-stiller1
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages kdm depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]       1.5.0        Debian configuration management sy
ii  kdebase-bin                 4:3.5.2-2+b1 core binaries for the KDE base mod
ii  kdebase-data                4:3.5.2-2    shared data files for the KDE base
ii  kdelibs4c2a                 4:3.5.2-2+b1 core libraries for all KDE applica
ii  libc6                       2.3.6-7      GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1                     1:4.1.0-1    GCC support library
ii  libpam-runtime              0.79-3.1     Runtime support for the PAM librar
ii  libpam0g                    0.79-3.1     Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libqt3-mt                   3:3.3.6-2    Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libstdc++6                  4.1.0-1      The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6                    2:1.0.0-6    X11 client-side library
ii  libxau6                     1:1.0.0-3    X11 authorisation library
ii  libxdmcp6                   1:1.0.0-4    X11 Display Manager Control Protoc
ii  libxtst6                    1:1.0.1-3    X11 Testing -- Resource extension 
ii  xbase-clients               1:7.0.1-1    miscellaneous X clients

Versions of packages kdm recommends:
ii  logrotate                     3.7.1-3    Log rotation utility

-- debconf information excluded



Reply to: