Bug#275211: kmail does not start (another relocation error)
* Josh Metzler [Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:35:14 -0400]:
> On Wednesday 06 October 2004 04:30 pm, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Josh Metzler [Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:05:18 -0400]:
> > > My comments
> > > to the original reporter about new debian revisions adding new symbols
> > > applies here, too.
> > I don't think it's the case, the symbol reported not to exist by the
> It is the case. The symbol
> _ZN4KPIM17AddresseeLineEdit7processERK8QCStringRK9QMemArrayIcERS1_RS5_
> exists in libkmailprivate 4:3.3.0-3, but not in libkmailprivate 4:3.3.0-2.
s/libkmailprivate/libkdepim1/ I imagine. then I completely agree and I
was mistaken before.
every day one learns something new...
> Why is this? New symbols shouldn't be appearing just in new Debian
> revisions, should they? If kmail 4:3.3.0-3 really needs libkdepim
> 4:3.3.0-3 and wont work with 4:3.3.0-2, then it either needs an explicit
> depends =4:3.3.0-3, or something needs to be done to keep it from using the
> new symbols.
> Josh
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of car
payments.
-- Earl Wilson
Reply to: