[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: pkg-kde: commit - rev 33 - people/jd/scripts



On Friday 13 February 2004 12:35, David Pashley wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2004 at 23:15, Chris Cheney praised the llamas by saying:
> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:53:52PM +0100, David Pashley wrote:
> > > Author: jd-guest
> > > Date: 2004-02-12 17:53:52 +0100 (Thu, 12 Feb 2004)
> > > New Revision: 33
> > > 
> > > Added:
> > >    people/jd/scripts/check-replaces
> > > Removed:
> > >    people/jd/scripts/check-conflicts.pl
> > > Log:
> > > It has come to my attention that I want to use Replaces, not Conflicts.
> > > script renamed and altered to read Replaces. The concept that a package
> > > conflicts with another package if they contain the same file is kept.
[..]
> > Also, as domi said when you use svn you should move the file not
> > add/remove so that changes can be tracked. :)
> > 
> I did an svn move check-conflicts.pl check-replaces. that is what it
> did. Not sure if it kept the history.

I was curious: yes history is kept.

svn -v svn also list that A comes from a rename

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r33 | jd-guest | 2004-02-12 17:53:52 +0100 (Thu, 12 Feb 2004) | 4 lines
Changed paths:
   D /people/jd/scripts/check-conflicts.pl
   A /people/jd/scripts/check-replaces (from /people/jd/scripts/check-conflicts.pl:31)

It has come to my attention that I want to use Replaces, not Conflicts.
script renamed and altered to read Replaces. The concept that a package
conflicts with another package if they contain the same file is kept.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
...

Can't be svn -v log -r<current-rev> used for the commit mails
(without ^---)? Or is the transaction not commited at this time?

Achim
> 
> > Chris
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> David Pashley
> david@davidpashley.com
> Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
> 

-- 
  To me vi is Zen.  To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
  a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
  You discover truth everytime you use it.
                                      -- reddy@lion.austin.ibm.com



Reply to: