Re: the kde meta-package or BTS #211985
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 24 Oct 2003 3:21 am, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 09:58:34PM +0100, Peter Nuttall wrote:
> > my point was questioning the value of a meta-package that would be the
> > logical thing to install if you were wanting kde but that seemed to be
> > both big and broken.
>
> It will be primarily of use for stable Debian releases when the dist has
> actually stablized and is installable. ;)
>
> > > That said meta-kde will be restructured very soon in that unofficial
> > > KDE apps will no longer be mentioned by meta-kde directly, there will
> > > be a second meta-kde-extras source that provides metapackages for them.
> > > This will allow backports to use meta-kde without unsolvable
> > > dependencies.
> >
> > this is want I was asking for. but went you talk of 'unofficial'
> > packages are you refering to the kde things like the games and the
> > multimedia packages or koffice and quanta or things like juk and arson?
>
> The official kde packages are:
> arts
> kde-i18n
> kdeaddons
> kdeadmin
> kdeartwork
> kdebase
> kdebindings
> kdeedu
> kdegames
> kdegraphics
> kdelibs
> kdemultimedia
> kdenetwork
> kdepim
> kdesdk
> kdetoys
> kdeutils
> quanta
>
> Note: Juk will be part of kdemultimedia in KDE 3.2 so will be part
> official at that point.
>
thanks
> Chris
- --
Peter Nuttall peter@nuttall.ukfsn.org
Don't CC me unless I ask
"... being a Debian unstable user is sort of like living in a house inhabited
by a large family of carpenters and architects. Every morning when
you wake up, the house is a little different. Maybe there is a new
turret, or some walls have moved. Or perhaps someone has temporarily
removed the floor under your bed."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/mWuzcA58uJCvV4URAjx+AKCnTwUzs2rKlqQYsFM4H7YnSGiNegCfVDt7
OoBNchp7x7YXOJMjMxc7nVU=
=0Qnp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: