Re: So what's kdebase waiting for now?
Nathanael Nerode writes:
> ...taps fingers.... "ASAP" as of two days ago. Any chance this
> will happen this year?!?
I've been naggin enough, so I'll try to be constructive here :)
The kdebase bugs that I think are relevant to this upload ( I've been
working through quite some kdebase bugs recently, so I'm becoming a
bit familiar with them ;) ) are the following:
Simple bugs with a patch that should be applied, or that can be closed
anyhow:
important:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=218731
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=196370
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=142489
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=154065
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=183056
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=192550
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=209856
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=209532
normal:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=160428
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=129301
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=141845
Not sure about these:
These guys posted translations for a template file, I guess that if
you convert to po-debconf, this can be reassigned to another package
or closed ? If you don't convert to po-debconf yet, then I think
the translations should be included in the template file.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=132615
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=137057
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=137940
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=139733
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=142540
These are bugs that you ( Chris ) tagged as pending, so I assume you
know what to do with them ?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=206958
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=208267
I hope this helps you to not forget some things. If you use this, and
someone later complains that you forgot to include a patch, you can
blame me, of course ;)
cheers
domi
Reply to: