Your message dated Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:47:02 +0100 with message-id <YFIkdu/yMVRjx3Tr@mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#985404: qa.debian.org: Packages overview VCS field doesn't consider a debian/experimental branch has caused the Debian Bug report #985404, regarding qa.debian.org: Packages overview VCS field doesn't consider a debian/experimental branch to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 985404: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=985404 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: qa.debian.org: Packages overview VCS field doesn't consider a debian/experimental branch
- From: Andreas Rönnquist <gusnan@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:59:43 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 60521960.1c69fb81.b32b9.9e09@mx.google.com>
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist The VCS field on developer Packages overview doesn't seem to consider a debian/experimental branch. In my example, the package scite, where unstable has version 4.4.5-2, and salsa has the tag debian/4.4.5-2 on the debian/master branch, and it has 5.0.0-1~exp1 in experimental, and the tag debian/5.0.0-1_exp1 on the debian/experimental branch. The Package overview shows Git - 4.4.5-2 (with the version in red as if there's a problem with it) as if that is the latest in Git. My package overview where the problem is visible at https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=gusnan%40debian.org I can see other packages that have experimental packaging in the debian/master branch not showing this as a problem, or even those where the experimental branch is called simply experimental (and not debian/experimental) also not showing the version as problematic. DEP-14 mentions debian/experimental and debian/unstable, but it shouldn't be an error to use debian/experimental as branch name even if using debian/master, right? Please inform me if it is simply user error. -- Andreas Rönnquist gusnan@debian.org
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Andreas Rönnquist <gusnan@debian.org>, 985404-close@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#985404: qa.debian.org: Packages overview VCS field doesn't consider a debian/experimental branch
- From: Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:47:02 +0100
- Message-id: <YFIkdu/yMVRjx3Tr@mapreri.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 60521960.1c69fb81.b32b9.9e09@mx.google.com>
- References: <[🔎] 60521960.1c69fb81.b32b9.9e09@mx.google.com>
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 03:59:43PM +0100, Andreas Rönnquist wrote: > The VCS field on developer Packages overview doesn't seem to consider a > debian/experimental branch. How would DDPO (actually, vcswatch is the component you are interested in) go about knowing that. > The Package overview shows Git - 4.4.5-2 (with the version in red as if > there's a problem with it) as if that is the latest in Git. The problem is in your packages. The branch vcswatch is using the one pointed by HEAD. If that doesn't contain the version it is expecting, that's marked as an error. In your case, you should be specifying the branch in Vcs-Git, using the -b flag, as documented in Policy. > I can see other packages that have experimental packaging in the > debian/master branch not showing this as a problem, Yes, that's correct, because HEAD points to the branch containing the most up-to-date packaging. > or even those where > the experimental branch is called simply experimental (and not > debian/experimental) also not showing the version as problematic. This sounds weird, do you have an example? > DEP-14 mentions debian/experimental and debian/unstable, but it > shouldn't be an error to use debian/experimental as branch name even if > using debian/master, right? DEP-14 or any naming standard does not matter here. vcswatch doesn't have any specific implementation regarding this. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---