[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#778240: tracker.debian.org has much worse display clarity



Le 30/12/2015 19:06, Ian Jackson a écrit :
> Stéphane Blondon writes ("Re: Bug#778240: tracker.debian.org has much worse display clarity"):
>> I can provide a new demo which fixes these remarks if you're interested.
> 
> That would be great.  That would offer Raphael a debugged alternative
> to the current style.

I've done 2 versions.
In each version, the class for the 'Go' button is modified from
btn-default to btn-primary so the button is visible. The height for list
elements (wishlist, low, normal) is increased so the bottom of the
labels is not hidden.

- tracker2:
http://stephane.yaal.fr/tmp/tracker2/Debian%20Package%20Tracker%20-%20most.html

The link color is rolled back to the default bootstrap color. So the CSS
is simpler.


- tracker 3:
http://stephane.yaal.fr/tmp/tracker3/Debian%20Package%20Tracker%20-%20most.html

White color overwrite the link color so the 'Subscribe' link and the
number of bugs are easier to read.

The provided patches are provided against the Ian's style.css version.


-- 
Stéphane
--- style.css.orig	2016-01-02 16:36:54.000000000 +0100
+++ style.css	2016-01-02 16:36:54.000000000 +0100
@@ -8,10 +8,6 @@
     line-height: 1;
 }
 
-a:link{
-    color: #0530D7;
-}
-
 .page-header {
     padding: 0.5rem 0;
 }
@@ -185,7 +181,7 @@
 .list-group-item {
   position: relative;
   display: block;
-  padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px;
+  padding: 2px 5px 5px 5px;
   margin-bottom: -1px;
   border: 1px solid #dddddd;
 }
--- style.css.orig	2016-01-02 16:37:14.000000000 +0100
+++ style.css	2016-01-02 17:13:22.000000000 +0100
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@
 .list-group-item {
   position: relative;
   display: block;
-  padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px;
+  padding: 2px 5px 5px 5px;
   margin-bottom: -1px;
   border: 1px solid #dddddd;
 }
@@ -298,3 +298,7 @@
   padding-right: 10px;
 }
 
+.btn-primary, .label {
+  color: #FFF !important;
+}
+

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: