[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#757351: marked as done (tracker.debian.org: regression from old-pts: RFH source packages aren't listed)

Your message dated Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:25:50 +0100
with message-id <20151216172550.GA16440@home.ouaza.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#757351: tracker.debian.org: regression from old-pts: RFH source packages aren't listed
has caused the Debian Bug report #757351,
regarding tracker.debian.org: regression from old-pts: RFH source packages aren't listed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
757351: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757351
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi,

here's what tracker.d.o says for debian-installer, under "action
needed":
| The package depends on source packages which need a new maintainer.
| 6 bugs tagged patch in the BTS
| lintian reports 2 warnings

while old-pts is a bit more helpful:
| This package has "Build-Depends: dosfstools" while dosfstools needs a new maintainer, see O #756088.
| This package has "Build-Depends: hfsutils" while hfsutils needs a new maintainer, see O #677770.
| This package has "Build-Depends: elilo" while elilo needs a new maintainer, see O #707112. 

Something like this would be nice:
| The package depends on source packages which need a new maintainer:
|   dosfstools (#756088), elilo (#707112), hfsutils (#677770)

No need to retain the old, a bit too verbose wording IMHO.

Thanks for considering.

Mraw,
KiBi.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On Thu, 07 Aug 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Have you seen that you get (most) of this information if you click on the
> > question mark next to the entry?
> 
> Having to click is a major usability regression from just having to read.
> 
> Also, a question mark looks like a help button. So counterintuitive anyway.

I switched to use a chevron on the left to indicate that more information
is available.

I added the WNPP bug number in the long description too. I'm thus closing
this bug now.

Let me know if you see further improvements.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/

--- End Message ---
Reply to: