Hi, On Montag, 1. Dezember 2014, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > OK, those are legitimate concerns (and blockers for your use cases, > IIUC), but they are unrelated to the actual timeline for shutting down > the old PTS. yes & yes > That is to say: you are not migrating "your" links for > reasons other than "the tracker hasn't been officially blessed as PTS > replacement yet", right? well, that and because of these bugs the new tracker breaks my habbits, so I'm reluctant for selfish^wpersonal reasons too. > I have no idea if someone is maintaining a list of legitimate "blockers" > that are inhibiting a complete migration to the new tracker (including a > shutdown of the old one). My tentative answer about this would be "no > one is doing that", but I might be wrong. Personally, I certainly > consider the new tracker good enough and I've stopped using the old PTS > long ago. The main reason for keeping around the old PTS, at least for > me, is currently in the realm of "let's give people enough time to > migrate their links, habits, etc". /me nods. I think such a list of blockers would be useful, but I'm not going to do it... > In the meantime, if people have migration blockers, the best way forward > is providing patches :) ; and the second best let this list know (as you > just did). ..as I also don't have time to provide patches here, mostly due to lack of time but also because CSS is not my favorite programming language ;) cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.