[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#459012: marked as done (qa.debian.org: DEHS should check for validity of Homepage: and Vcs-Browser:)

Your message dated Thu, 23 May 2013 22:31:01 +0800
with message-id <CAKTje6GUKMpLX+_35zYiHhKEY3DxZ9HiTzUb+Rjuv6XtE_zFTQ@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#459012: qa.debian.org: DEHS should check for validity of Homepage: and Vcs-Browser:
has caused the Debian Bug report #459012,
regarding qa.debian.org: DEHS should check for validity of Homepage: and Vcs-Browser:
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
459012: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=459012
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Tags: dehs

It would be good if the URLs in the Homepage: and Vcs-Browser: fields
can also be checked for not being 404 etc. in DEHS

Giridhar

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Fri, Jan 4, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:

> It would be good if the URLs in the Homepage: and Vcs-Browser: fields
> can also be checked for not being 404 etc. in DEHS

Homepage and Vcs-* URLs are now checked by the DUCK service, which is
linked to from the PTS:

http://duck.debian.net/

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

--- End Message ---
Reply to: