On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 03:03:33PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Monday 20 August 2012 01:18 PM, Ricardo Mones wrote: > > Mail is already sent when a package migrates succesfully, so absence of > > such mail on the expected time should give you a hint. > > > > The situations you describe already grant very likely you have received > > an RC bug mail describing the problem. You already know an RC bug will > > prevent your package from migrating, so another mail telling the obvious > > is just useless IMO. > > It won't hurt to receive an extra email. That's just because you still don't receive enough. Not everybody is so lucky ;) > No. Migration blockages are not always due to RC bugs. I filed this > report because I got hit by this. My package, open-iscsi, was blocked > because its dependent package, scsi-modules provided by the kernel, > recently stopped building on all architectures. > > For this situation, I never got an email. So, please, if it can be done, > it'll be good. Sure, and not receiving it 10 days after uploading should have been a hint something was wrong, as said. Anyway that's a matter of preferences. As long as implementation is opt-in only it will be good. regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it. Richard Feynman
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature