On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 08:18:13AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 31.07.2012 07:35, Andreas Tille wrote:
>The problem I'm now wondering is the excuses page for beast-mcmc:
>
> http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=beast-mcmc
>
>I have no idea why it is mentioning
>
> beast-doc, beast-examples
>
>for certain architectures even if these packages are arch=all and
>I can
>not find any reason for the "out of data" claims.
>
>Any explanation would be welcome
beast-mcmc (- to 1.6.2-3)
[...]
out of date on armel: beast-doc, beast-examples (from 1.6.2-1)
The source package is -3, the binaries being complained about are
from -1; that makes them out-of-date. Indeed:
beast-doc | 1.6.2-1 | unstable/contrib | all
dak adds the arch:all packages to every packages file, so britney
seems them as out of date on every architecture.
Could you suggest any appropriate way to get rid of these packages
which
should never have been there? Filing another bug report to
ftp.debian.org to remove beast-doc, beast-examples in version
1.6.2-1
and only this version?