[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#565219: closed by Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> (Re: Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect)



On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 07:14:01PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:53:50PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:19:35 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:57:17PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > > In summary, I think that test-1 could be considered OK, unless we
> > > > manage to find a way to further enhance the result...
> > > 
> > > This was long overdue, but the graphs are now officially on
> > > qa.debian.org,
> > 
> > Cool! Thanks!
> > 
> > > I also modified the rrdtool graph command so that missing data don't
> > > leave white stripes on the graphs (though I wonder if that has an impact
> > > on packages that no bugs now but had some a few months ago)
> > 
> > Mmmmh, it seems it has an impact: see for instance
> > http://packages.qa.debian.org/libd/libdata-dump-streamer-perl.html
> > which has no bugs currently, but the graph still reports 1 pending bug:
> > http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs/libd/libdata-dump-streamer-perl.png
> 
> I tried to find one such package but failed. I'll take a look.

I think I fixed it. The graph you pointed is refreshed, the others will
be refreshed by the cronjob in a few hours.

Mike



Reply to: