Bug#565219: closed by Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> (Re: Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect)
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:53:50PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:19:35 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:57:17PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > In summary, I think that test-1 could be considered OK, unless we
> > > manage to find a way to further enhance the result...
> >
> > This was long overdue, but the graphs are now officially on
> > qa.debian.org,
>
> Cool! Thanks!
>
> > I also modified the rrdtool graph command so that missing data don't
> > leave white stripes on the graphs (though I wonder if that has an impact
> > on packages that no bugs now but had some a few months ago)
>
> Mmmmh, it seems it has an impact: see for instance
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/libd/libdata-dump-streamer-perl.html
> which has no bugs currently, but the graph still reports 1 pending bug:
> http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs/libd/libdata-dump-streamer-perl.png
I tried to find one such package but failed. I'll take a look.
> Moreover, I noticed that
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/liba/libalien-wxwidgets-perl.html
> has no graph:
> http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs/liba/libalien-wxwidgets-perl.png
That is somehow expected, for packages that never had bugs during the
time the data was gathered. That's not new, by the way.
Mike
Reply to: