[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#565499: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Claims 2.9.5.0.37.5.2 of binutils-h8300-hms is in unstable)

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:00:21 +0200
with message-id <4C3B9075.3070806@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Processed: Re: DDPO doesn't deal with multiple versions in Sources
has caused the Debian Bug report #560352,
regarding qa.debian.org: Claims 2.9.5.0.37.5.2 of binutils-h8300-hms is in unstable
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
560352: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560352
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: qa.debian.org

On http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mt&comaint=yes for some reason
version 2.9.5.0.37.5.2 (which is only in the archive for hurd, all other archs
have 2.16.1-4 at least) is claimed to be the version in unstable, with all the
consequences (DEHS/watch warning, excuses links, ...). I have no idea how this
could possibly happen.

Best,
Michael

Attachment: pgpUgoXsAIBOJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 07/12/2010 11:30 PM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Is the bug that the package is still shown for your 'main' section?

yes.

> That's because you are the maintainer of the testing version.

ok, didn't remembered that. so things will clear once they migrate..
let's close the bug then.

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

--- End Message ---
Reply to: