[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#494557: marked as done (PTS: Maintainer of pastebinit package not receiving bug mail)



Your message dated Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:37:58 +0100
with message-id <20100124153758.GA16123@df7cb.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#494557: ftp.debian.org: Maintainer of pastebinit package not receiving bug mail
has caused the Debian Bug report #494557,
regarding PTS: Maintainer of pastebinit package not receiving bug mail
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
494557: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=494557
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: important

Hi there,

I am the maintainer of the pastebinit package in debian.  Still, I
don't receive any notification for bugs filed against this package.
Would you be so kind to take a look?

Regards

Rolf



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
severity 494557 normal
tags 494557 moreinfo
thanks

Re: Rolf Leggewie 2008-08-10 <20080810155310.17944.25371.reportbug@local.leggewie.biz>
> I am the maintainer of the pastebinit package in debian.  Still, I
> don't receive any notification for bugs filed against this package.
> Would you be so kind to take a look?

Hi,

I don't see you in the subscribers list of pastebinit, in fact no one
is subscribed to that package. Maintainer bug mail comes directly from
the BTS, so if that doesn't work, you should check with the BTS
people.

I'm closing the PTS bug - please reopen if there's a specific PTS
problem.

Christoph
-- 
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/


--- End Message ---

Reply to: