[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Udd not accessible via psql after move to other host



On 15/05/09 at 10:23 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:10:22AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > tille@merkel:~$ /usr/lib/postgresql/8.3/bin/psql -q 'service=udd'
> > > udd=> \d packages
> > > ERROR:  column "reltriggers" does not exist
> > > LINE 1: SELECT relhasindex, relkind, relchecks, reltriggers, relhasr...
> > >                                                 ^
> > >  o From alioth.debian.org: psql 'service=udd'
> > 
> > That's caused by using 8.3 on the client side and 8.4 on the server
> > side. Can you live without it (using the schema on the website, for
> > example) ?
> 
> Well, I was just wondering what happens.  I do not really depend on
> a working '\d' command - but I'd consider it as confusing if something
> what I'd call 'basic functionality' just does not work (and others
> might stumble upon it as well).  I'd rather prefer to install a
> backported 8.4 on merkel.  If this has not real chance we should
> at least add the information that '\d' does not work.

could you add that to the wiki?

> BTW, id there any reason to run UDD on PostgreSQL 8.4?

yes, better autovacuum support.

> > > tille@alioth:~$ psql 'service=udd'
> > > psql: server closed the connection unexpectedly
> > >         This probably means the server terminated abnormally
> > >         before or while processing the request.
> > > 
> > >  o Same with python-psycopg2: conn = psycopg2.connect(host="localhost",port=5441,user="guest",database="udd")                                                                                                       
> > 
> > That's caused by an expired SSL certificate on alioth.
> 
> May I assume that somebody will care about this or should we do
> any action?

DSA and alioth admins are aware of it.
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


Reply to: